Private Equity's New Move: Nonprofit Hospital Joint Ventures That Might Sidestep the Laws States Just Passed

At least 568 U.S. healthcare facilities, hospitals, rehab centers, ambulatory surgery centers, hospice, home health, and behavioral health sites, now operate as joint ventures between private equity firms and nonprofit health systems, according to a July 6, 2026 report from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. The group rounds that to “more than 500” and calls it a likely undercount, since it only captured publicly identifiable deals.

Quick answer: “As you get more legislation coming through in the last few years, we see private equity may be pivoting more toward this type of business model,” says Matt Parr, communications director at the Private Equity Stakeholder Project (Stateline, July 13, 2026). One version of that pivot: co-owning facilities through nonprofit health systems, a structure the 2025 state oversight laws weren’t written to catch. 21.4% of PE-owned hospitals are now structured this way, and the regulatory guidance governing it predates the entire modern PE-in-healthcare wave.

What Is a Nonprofit-PE Joint Venture, Exactly?

A nonprofit-PE joint venture is a co-ownership arrangement where a private equity firm and a nonprofit health system jointly run a facility, with the nonprofit typically remaining the name on the building. PESP’s July 2026 report found 21.4% of private-equity-owned hospitals nationwide fit this pattern (PESP, July 6, 2026).

Apollo-owned LifePoint Health is the report’s clearest example. LifePoint operates 61% of its hospitals through joint ventures with nonprofit and other healthcare providers, per the same PESP report. That’s not a side arrangement at one or two sites. That’s most of a national hospital chain running through a structure where a nonprofit’s name sits on top of a private equity balance sheet.

Duke LifePoint is the sharpest single example of what that looks like on the ground. Roughly 97% of its 15 to 16 hospitals across four states are LifePoint-owned through this joint-venture structure, including a hospital in Wilson, North Carolina, that has faced Medicare-funding jeopardy three times and drawn an investigation from the North Carolina Attorney General’s office (Stateline, July 13, 2026).

The appeal for a PE firm is straightforward. A joint venture lets the firm access a facility’s revenue, governance influence, and often real estate, without appearing as the direct, sole acquirer on any public filing or state notification form. The nonprofit gets capital and stays technically in charge. Everybody involved can describe the deal accurately and still leave regulators looking at the wrong entity.

Why Don’t the New State Laws Catch This?

Seven states wrote laws in 2025 specifically to put private equity healthcare deals under review, and none of that language was built with the nonprofit-JV structure in mind. The oversight mechanisms, mostly notice-and-review requirements aimed at the buyer, assume private equity is the direct acquirer of record, which a joint venture is engineered not to show.

That gap traces back further than the 2025 legislative wave. The governing IRS guidance is Revenue Ruling 98-15 (1998-1 C.B. 718) and Revenue Ruling 2004-51, decades before large PE-backed hospital platforms existed at scale (PESP, July 6, 2026; corroborated by MedCity News, July 2026). Rules written for a very different kind of partnership are now the operating framework for a structure nobody anticipated when the rules were drafted.

The pattern here isn’t unique to healthcare, but it’s especially costly in it: a regulation built to police one legal form gets bypassed by a slightly different legal form carrying the same practical control. States didn’t write bad laws. They wrote laws for the deal shape private equity was using in 2024, and the deal shape moved.

Matt Parr, communications director at PESP, put the fix plainly: “Policymakers need to take a look and make sure that they’re future-proofing their states’ regulations for stuff like this” (Stateline, July 13, 2026). That’s a modest ask. It’s also one that requires legislators to notice the workaround before the next legislative session, not after.

Which State Laws Are Actually at Risk of Being Sidestepped?

Seven states, California, Indiana, Massachusetts, Maine, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington, passed laws in 2025 requiring more oversight or advance notification of private equity healthcare acquisitions (Stateline, Nov. 21, 2025). Each was built to slow down or expose direct PE buyouts. None of them, as written, was tested against a joint-venture structure at scale.

Connecticut offers the sharpest example of how specific these laws can get, and how specific the workaround problem becomes as a result. Governor Ned Lamont signed SB 196 in May 2025, the first statewide ban on hospital sale-leaseback transactions, and it also bars private equity entities from holding controlling authority over hospital governance and operations (Becker’s ASC). That’s a real, enforceable restriction on direct control. Whether “controlling authority” reaches a minority-but-influential stake inside a nonprofit joint venture is a separate legal question, and it’s the exact question the nonprofit-JV structure is built to make murky.

The legislative appetite to close gaps like this hasn’t slowed down. At least 79 bills addressing private equity or investor-backed healthcare ownership have been documented across 25 states as of early 2026, per the Private Equity Stakeholder Project’s legislative tracker (PESP, March 9, 2026; AJMC, May 11, 2026). Volume is high. Whether the bill language actually reaches co-ownership structures is the part that still varies state to state.

Who Else Is Using This Structure?

LifePoint isn’t the only name PESP’s report ties to nonprofit joint ventures. The report also identifies Compassus and Ardent Health Services as operators using the structure, and names Ascension among the nonprofit systems that appear as counterparties in these arrangements (PESP, July 6, 2026).

None of that means every joint venture involving these organizations is engineered to dodge a specific state law. It means the structure is common enough, and spread across enough recognizable names, that treating it as a fringe tactic understates how normal it’s already become.

Why This Should Matter to Employers and Patients, Not Just Regulators

This isn’t only a legislative-drafting problem. It’s an information problem for anyone choosing a hospital, a health plan network, or a behavioral health referral. When ownership sits behind a nonprofit’s name, patients and benefits teams lose a signal they’ve relied on for decades: nonprofit status as a rough proxy for mission over margin.

Behavioral economics has a name for this: information asymmetry. The party with less visibility into a decision, here, the patient or the employer choosing a network, ends up carrying more risk without knowing it. A hospital’s nonprofit letterhead used to tell you something about incentive structure. Increasingly, it tells you who signed the lease, not who’s actually steering.

We’ve written before about how private equity ownership changes clinical staffing, billing practices, and closure risk once it enters behavioral health and hospital settings. The nonprofit-JV structure doesn’t change any of those underlying incentives. It just makes them harder for the people affected by them to see coming.

FAQ

What is a private equity nonprofit healthcare joint venture? It’s a co-ownership structure where a private equity firm and a nonprofit health system jointly run a facility, with the nonprofit usually remaining the name of record. PESP identified at least 568 U.S. facilities structured this way as of July 2026, spanning hospitals, rehab, surgery centers, hospice, home health, and behavioral health.

Why don’t state private equity oversight laws catch nonprofit joint ventures? Most state laws target direct PE acquisitions through notice or attorney-general review requirements. Critics argue the nonprofit-JV structure may fall outside that scope, since the nonprofit stays the entity of record even when a PE firm holds substantial ownership and governance influence underneath it.

How many PE-owned hospitals are actually structured as nonprofit joint ventures? 21.4% of private-equity-owned hospitals nationwide are joint ventures with nonprofit systems, per PESP’s July 2026 report. Apollo-owned LifePoint Health is the sharpest example: 61% of its hospitals run through joint ventures with nonprofit and other providers.

Which states have passed laws targeting private equity in healthcare? Seven states, California, Indiana, Massachusetts, Maine, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington, enacted oversight laws in 2025. Connecticut’s SB 196, signed that May, went further, banning hospital sale-leasebacks and barring PE entities from controlling hospital governance outright.

Is the joint-venture loophole likely to get closed soon? Legislative activity is accelerating: at least 79 bills on private equity or investor-backed healthcare ownership have been documented across 25 states as of early 2026, per the Private Equity Stakeholder Project’s legislative tracker. Whether that volume translates into language that specifically reaches joint-venture structures remains an open question this year.

Sources

1. Private Equity Stakeholder Project, “Private Equity Nonprofit Healthcare Joint Ventures”, Jim Baker, Ryan Leitner, and Michael Fenne, July 6, 2026.
2. MedCity News, “Report Highlights Private Equity’s Lesser-Known Strategy: Nonprofit Joint Ventures”, July 2026.
3. Stateline (States Newsroom), “Private Equity Might Dodge State Laws by Partnering With Healthcare Nonprofits”, July 13, 2026.
4. Stateline (States Newsroom), “New State Laws Tackle Private Equity’s Growing Role in Health Care”, November 21, 2025.
5. Becker’s ASC, “Every State That Cracked Down on Private Equity in 2025”, 2025.
6. Private Equity Stakeholder Project, “Dozens of State Bills Propose Addressing Private Equity in Healthcare”, March 9, 2026.
7. AJMC, “Regulating Private Equity in Health Care: A Strategic Policy Agenda”, May 11, 2026.

Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, clinical, legal, or therapeutic advice, and reading it does not create a therapist-client relationship with Matthew Sexton, LCSW or Mental Wealth Solutions, Inc.. Although the author is a licensed clinical social worker, the content in this article is not clinical assessment, diagnosis, or treatment.

Private equity ownership structures, state healthcare regulations, and the specific facilities or systems named in this article change over time, and details may shift after publication. Nothing here is a substitute for confirming a specific ownership arrangement, regulatory requirement, or legal question with the relevant state agency, a facility’s public disclosures, or qualified counsel. Regulations and ownership structures vary by state and by facility, and what is described here may not match every situation.

If you are in immediate emotional crisis, you can reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988 (US). If you are experiencing domestic violence or are in physical danger, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or visit thehotline.org. In a life-threatening emergency, call 911.