When AI Grades AI, the Safety Problems Disappear
100 mental health professionals graded LLM answers to real patient questions. AI judges systematically overrated them and missed safety problems experts caught.
Sorted newest first. Each post links primary sources and methodology.
100 mental health professionals graded LLM answers to real patient questions. AI judges systematically overrated them and missed safety problems experts caught.
LifeStance Health told shareholders it delivered 2.3 million visits, up 17%, on 11% clinician growth (November 6, 2025). That is the shareholder-run model in its own words. No published study compares clinician-led mental health tools against investor-owned ones on care outcomes, and that absence is the story.
Across 20,302 notes, AI-scribed visits logged more psychiatric symptoms but fewer depression diagnoses — 9% versus 12%. Human scribes showed no such effect.
By my math a solo practice pays $8,000 to $32,000 in year one for a website, marketing, and admin. AI collapses most of that into a few subscriptions, itemized here.
58% of small businesses used generative AI in 2025, up from 40% a year earlier. Here is how a solo therapist runs the whole business side, website to video, with AI.
States screened 793 AI health bills; only 28 mentioned mental health, and none protect your therapy transcripts. Here is who owns your data today, and who should.
Just 25.4% of patients will share health data with for-profit companies, versus 80.2% with research groups. The real fight is who governs the AI scribe.
In 2025, 47 states introduced 250+ healthcare-AI bills — Illinois, Nevada, and Maine turned theirs into law: AI can do the paperwork, a licensed human owns the care.
Industry analysis, technical deep-dives, field reports. Or book a discovery call to talk about your population.